I just realised how low-res Twitter and Facebook are! Not enough to see these planets.
If you keep clicking on this image it will eventual link to a
3456 x 4608 pixel original version
I think this is a pic of Jupiter and Neptune! Thu 24 Nov 2022 17:45:48 in Auckland. ISO6400 and a 1/7 second handheld taken in between breathes by the looks. f/1.6 on my Oppo Find X octocpu-phone.
Aint' it just so horrifically hard to take a good pic of the moon on your phone?!
Posted by tomachi on November 4th, 2022 filed in Rants
It's not scary it's enjoyable. Better to be a happy retard than a miserable fraudulent peddler of "truth" or a Zucked up "trusted news initiative" fact checker, what a joke.
Jacinda Ardern what a fucking giant Karen
Information is the base level of reality below quantum fields. It encompasses bullshit too so it's impossible to separate out a category of information that is outside of the other set "real information" - that's absurd and I don't trust the motherfuckers putting that garbage out. There is no such reason to fear misinformation just like there is no Dark Matter / Dark Energy - how do these retards plan to prove that the artifacts are part of the nefarious "bad information" as if the stuff had a north or south pole clearly visible. Intentionally misleading content is still content, it's just that it's not true, and yes there is political propaganda, fake cover stories, and cover ups that might qualify. That's different though. People generally don't go shouting untrue information at full volume to all their friends and family - why would they? People talk bullshit at high volume because they believe its true not because they believe it's false.
#freejulianassange
Even if there was such a thing, call it "untrue facts" or whatever, this abstract substance is just a subset of a greater more encompassing set: all information. And rather than some figment of the imagination, anti-matter is real proven stuff. It's not anti-information. The actual criminal content is already illegal and does not need extra treatment. The proposed or perceived negative effects of these thoughts or ideas is exactly what? Vaccine hesitancy? That is a good outcome - 1. fools rush in it took 5 years to understand what the side-effects of Thalidomide are, 2. It's a leaky vaccine, not like normal sterilizing vaccines and should only be given to those at risk, not children. 3. It converts people into super-spreader viral body shedding "virus evolution environments".
I watched the Berg beheading video... sure, it is one of those "what has been seen, can not be unseen" moments.
Lets say the Christchurch mosque shooting as an example of a negative effect of information, let's say a result of the Al Quada mind virus that led to the world trade centres being hit by planes... well it's not really misinformation is it? 9/11 Was a real event best I can tell. How you gonna suppress that? Do you reckon you could prove that harm came from some leak from whistleblower? Bigotry and racial hatred is not "information". The Christchurch attack wasn't even terrorism, it would an Australia nutter who acted alone, and did not have "a message" or threat that others from his cell could act on, unlike Osama Bin Laden, who had been trying to bomb that place since all through the nineties - remember the basement carpark bomb? Facts tend to have half-lives. Consider Newton's theory of gravity usurped by Einstein. Or that the sun always rises in the East. It won't always do that. As Socrates once said: Wisest is he who claims no knowledge. People who claim to know the truth and what is right and wrong are fools.
This bomb I don't was Misinformation... it was a force that killed 6 people.
I tend to agree with the analysis of SOYEON Lim, available in this pdf:
Some contend that the media has a right of editorial judgement, which is an exercise of the broader right to free speech in the mass media context. For example, the print media has a right to determine what photographs and text will comprise articles in the absence of positive legal restrictions. The United States Supreme Court has held that this right stems from the personal right to free speech, rather than being a special journalistic right. The First Amendment precludes the government from exercising prior restraint on speech and shields the press from retaliation over what gets published. Unlike the individual right to free speech, the media’s freedom is ethically limited by the obligation to serve the public. Publications must, therefore, be linked to seeking truth, or constitute an opinion or criticism related to this goal.
...
The Unique Value of Visual Accounts
Sharing the disturbing visual content of the video could be justifiable if it had informative value. Often, raw and unsanitised images taken on the scene and published by the media become icons of significant events. Ethical principles direct the media to publish all information that adds value to the truth-seeking process, including fearlessly identifying and using original sources (where possible) without distortion. The right images can show in detail what really happened, something which words alone cannot truly convey. 96 In particular, a first-hand visual account can communicate the impact of something, which is not always imaginable via words. Graphic and violent images have informative value when the violence in itself has meaning and is directly connected to the truth sought by the media.
Well, I got some unsanitised visual information for ya right now ya bastard: How about footage of Tiananmen Square Massacre where maybe up to 10,000 lost their lives... leaving a messy human mince meat left behind after the Communist bastards tanks rolled "tank man" and helpless female students were bayoneted to death.
Posted by tomachi on June 2nd, 2022 filed in Rants
The saucey nature of this email I received as a Google Ads customer - makes me wonder how far geo-targetted it is to my part of the world - New Zealand. Hopefully it's the Australians with the mail order bride problem not NZ. Hard to say.The email is below if you'd like to read. In June, Google will update it's enforcement procedures for Google ads. Essentially it says no hookers, no mail order brides, and no highly leveraged investment options schemes please. Very interesting.
Hang on, mail order brides and compensated sexual acts? Wowee. How is this even a thing on Google Ads? Google does not allow hookers and sex slaves to run ads, but I guess, this shows some advertisers are "sneaking in" ads disguised as something else using their platform. This is kinda amazing.
How does this be a thing? Dating site perhaps? I guess that could be tricky to police aye?
Let's say the email was mostly written for Australia / NZ customers by Google global, what would that say? If it is written to address the global issues they face, then maybe, hopefully, this mail-order brides issue has nothing to do with New Zealand or Australia? I reckon we busted for compensated sexual acts though. Hehe. That's mostly what caught my eye actually.
Sometimes, from an infosec perspective, it's interesting to read about "whats hot" in state of the art criminal activity / technology crime.
Is Google seeing increased use of its ad network for prostitution in New Zealand?
I'm mostly sure this email would be geo-targetted for NZ, and only goes to Google Ads customers in New Zealand and possibly some other countries nearby.
Maybe I need to get a job (yeah)... so I don't think about such matters and make such blog posts etc... and I know it's a but: sounds like hookers, mail-order brides, and binary options are big at the moment! Is this email digging the fact I last paid for a Google ad in NZD? On my main MCC account which is also my core Google account (agency account).
This post is jovial. As in not serious. Please don't start a new mail order human or binary options trading company.
In June 2022, Google will update the enforcement procedures for repeat violations with the addition of nine more policies in scope of the strike-base system. Google will begin implementing the strike-based system on 21 June 2022, with a gradual ramp up over a period of three months, for the following policies:
•
Compensated sexual acts
•
Mail-order brides
•
Clickbait
•
Misleading ad design
•
Bail bond services
•
Call directories, forwarding and recording services
Posted by tomachi on March 27th, 2022 filed in News, Science
correlation between vaccine and all cause mortality
Some recent headlines:WebMD says the FDA warns not be rushing to give children the vaccine, while Forbes says some are claiming it is not a vaccine. Fair call it is actually an experimental RNA gene therapy - maybe call it an immunisation yeah? Meanwhile the CDC listed it's side effects.
Little discussion is heard on Natural or Alternative Remedies
Let alone looking into Holistic Medicine or Alternative Treatments!
There are several kinds of holistic practitioners: Ideally they are doctors with a medical degree. They might base their treatments on holistic principles, which makes them a holistic doctor. Other holistic practitioners are not “real” medical doctors. They may be called “doctor” in their field, but they aren’t licensed to practice medicine. That's OK though because it's more of an art form that it is a sport.
Is Ivermectin any good? How come no taskforce on re-purposed drugs?
February 18, 2022
Efficacy of Ivermectin Treatment on Disease Progression Among Adults With Mild to Moderate COVID-19 and ComorbiditiesThe I-TECH Randomized Clinical Trial
Meaning The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.
A. Wesley Burks MD, in Middleton's Allergy: Principles and Practice, 2020
Molecular Crosstalk Between Epithelial Cells and Lung Dendritic Cells Leading to Th2 Immunity
In the recent years, there has been more focus on trying to dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying allergenicity and Th2 sensitization. Certainly, the triggering of TLRs on DCs by allergens and environmental triggers seems to be essential. However, one major caveat is that most of the studies performed have used BMDCs in mice or monocyte-derived DCs in humans to mimic lung DC responses. The direct effect of allergens on purified lung DCs remains unclear.
Posted by tomachi on February 6th, 2022 filed in News
In this study of the COVID-19 vaccine, the second dose was associated with a delay of 0.45 days (98.75% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.84) to the women's menstruation:Â bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2211
Published 16 September 2021
The RNA vaccines are fully synthetically engineered to contain a fragment of SARS-2 Spike protein.
UPDATE: So I dug into the stats from 2008 to 2017 at stats.govt.nz and the total number of historic deaths is exactly 303, 567 over the 10 year period which means averages of:
30,356.7 per year
2,529.7 per month
83.2 per dayThis lets the vaccine off the hook to some extent, if I extrapolate 30,356 per year down to the 42 day period post vaccination we get 3493 "background level" of deaths per 42 days from any cause.
It would be interesting to see how this works segmented by age however. Or maybe not, I just found this interesting study:
Hoeg and colleagues have demonstrated that the expected rates of myocarditis in young persons aged 12-17 could be as high as 162 cases/million persons injected. This is far greater than the background rate of 4 cases/million/year before COVID-19, as described by Arola and colleagues in Finland. Hoeg demonstrated that a young person is more likely to be hospitalized with vaccine-induced myocarditis than ever be hospitalized from COVID-19 respiratory illness.
Sadly, there are 15,424 confirmed myocarditis/pericarditis cases in the US CDC VAERS system. The explosion of sudden cardiac death among high-level athletes has drawn attention to the possibility that COVID-19 vaccination forced upon the players may induce a subclinical or perhaps denied syndrome of myocarditis that can last for months.
At the end of day, people who get Sars2 and survive will get full sterilising natural immunity, they won't get it again nor pass it on to others, yet those who have taken the vaccine have been shown to be able to still get and spread the virus
----
The following is an email I just sent to Medsafe and co. Did you like it how I inserted promo links to my latest EP in there? Cool idea huh. The email...
Verbatim copy of the email I sent to Medsafe
Dear Medsafe, CC: Jacinda, RNZ, bFM news, MOH general enquiries,
this email is aimed at Medsafe, you are CC'ed FYI.
In medsafe safety report 36, why does the expected death rate change from 1173 to 1653? By my calculation, the observed total of 1448 deaths post vaccination sits between the two, straddling statistical safety at "matchpoint".
Also, not sure if death is considered a serious adverse event or not, but only 1,290 have been reported to date, whereas 1,448 total people died in the 21 days after vaccination (actually 42 days for two shots), which I thought odd. I guess the 1,290 only includes people who definitely were killed by the vaccine, yes? Still though.... even that 1,290 is above (one of) the expected baseline rates of 1173 which proves the vaccine is deadly and in need of recall. Or not... if you go with the other 1653 number, then you can consider it safe and an elixir of life. So which number is correct and why the change? Whatever the case hopefully Jacinda will reconsider those silly vaccine passports - as they are a waste of time since they have no benefit. What is the point of vaccine passports by the way? Nelson Mandela would be turning in his grave at the resurrection of Apartheid about world presently.
Also, Jacinda - since we voted for the right to die, just let us die yeah? Cease protecting us please. End the lockdowns. Did you consider the suicide rate in your calculations?
As a side note - you should listen to my COVID-19 Tentacle EP Out Now! Featuring Chloe Swarbrick in the intro. Back to the death rate...
Since it (the extrapolated expected death rate values) were being used as a "random 21 day period between 2008-2019" it (death rate number) should not change. As It has the same source, an 11 year period:
Data for expected death rates was obtained from the AESI background rate (SAFE) study provided by the University of Auckland. The age-specific background rates used are the average from 2008-2019.
The tables are titled:
Observed-versus-expected deaths by age group from any cause, up to 21 days after dose 1, 19 February 2021 to 31 August 2021
Observed-versus-expected deaths by age group from any cause, up to 21 days after dose 2, 19 February 2021 to 31 August 2021
Both tables should compare to the same "expected deaths" number 2008-2019 but it goes from 1173 to 1653 - why is that?
I was unable to find this AESI background rate SAFE study -Â can you point me in the right direction or send it to me please?
Finally, when I am able to consider one number - not two - what is the period this number covers? Is it 21 days or 42 days?
Since the comparison data is intended for comparison to another 21 day period, it is most likely to be 21 days (implying a baseline death rate per year of either (365/21)* 1173Â |to| 1653 = 20,387 | 28,730 deaths per year from all causes.
By the way, I would have thought in NZ (5M/81yr) a rough ballpark rate to equal 61,728 deaths per year would be the baseline not 20 to 28k, based on our average lifespan 81 years and 5M population? Perhaps life expectancy is not the same as average lifespan.Â
But if the number comes from a 42 day period (which I suggest is fair based on 2 vaccine shots x 21 days) the vaccine steps over the line into the "proven harmful" category with the 1173 number by increasing one's chance of death on average by 23% rather than reducing it to 87.6% of previous showing safety with the 1653 number. A German study shows football players are 500% more likely to die during play, recently 6 people died from heart attacks during football games.
For these comparison percentages, I'm summing the deaths 21 days after vaccine for both the first (789) and second (659) shots, giving a total of 1448 deaths over a total of 42 days after both shots.
If the 1173 is correct, but only represents 21 days, then in my analysis it would be 2346 which is way higher than the total 1448 deaths after vaccine, meaning the vaccine is some kind of life elixir. I could not find the AESI study anywhere online. In fact, when I used negative keywords in Google, such as -covid and -2021 -2020 to try to remove COVID related info, I still could not find anything, making me doubt the "rate of all-cause death" here dubious. I guess I can check the stats.govt.nz next, which I intend to do now in fact.
Finally - don't forget to listen to my COVID-19 Tentacle EP Out Now! Featuring Chloe Swarbrick in the into.
-----------
UPDATE REGARDING 108 FOOTBALLERS DROPPING DEAD RECENTLY:
On the subject of Football players who drop dead of cardiac arrest while playing....
Not 24 athletes, not 30, nor 75 - Since December, 183 professional athletes and coaches have suddenly collapsed! 108 of them died! According to the literature, the phenomenon of collapsing athlete breakdown for reasons unrelated to injury is rare.
According to Wikipedia, under "List of association footballers who died while playing", in 2001-2020 there was an average of 4.2 deaths per year attributed to SCD or SUD, the vast majority being SCD. In contrast, in 2021, according to our list, there were 21 cases of SCD/SUD among FIFA players. In other words, instead of 4 SCD/SUD deaths per year (according to Wikipedia data), or 5 cases per year (calculated according to the BMJ) during 2001-2020, 21 players have died so far this year.
Having said all this... here is a dude who did not get a vaccine and was ravaged by COVID:
